EN | ES | DE | FR | IT | 日本語 | 한국어 | 中文

CAFC Rules USPTO Exceeded Its Authority Adjusting Patent Term

Buyer Beware: Secret Sales May Result in Subsequent Patent Invalidity
January 27, 2019
First Cannabis Patent to Survive IPR Challenge In Part
February 18, 2019

CAFC Rules USPTO Exceeded Its Authority Adjusting Patent Term


By: Katie Rubino

Recently on January 27th, 2019 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) exceeded its authority by adjusting the term of a patent. This case arose when the USPTO adjusted the term of a patent by subtracting 546 days (approximately 1.5 years) from the patent term due to delays during that occurred during the patent prosecution process.

The USPTO is allowed to adjust patent term under the Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) statute which was enacted in 1999 that allows for the term of a patent to be reduced or extended depending on the circumstances. The primary objective when Congress passed the PTA was to discourage delays in the patent application process. Under current U.S. laws, the term of a patent is twenty years from the filing date of the patent. The PTA allows for the patent term to be extended for delays caused by the USPTO during prosecution, such as for example, failing to timely provide a notification of allowance, delays due to when a patent is issued more than 3 years after its filing date, or delays caused by derivation proceedings, secrecy orders, and appeals. The PTA also allows for patent term to be shortened due to delays caused by an applicant, because of a lack of reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution. The PTA calculates the term of the adjustment by extending the term of a patent by the days of delay caused by the USPTO, minus the days of delay caused by an applicant. The days of delay are calculated in a 1:1 ratio, whereby 1 day of delay caused by an applicant or 1 day of delay caused by the USPTO equates to 1 day of reduction or 1 day of additional patent term.

This ruling stems from Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Iancu case. In that case, Supernus filed a patent application for an Osmotic Drug Delivery System in 2006. Prosecution continued on the application until Supernus received a final rejection in 2010. Supernus continued to prosecute the application, filing a request for continued examination (RCE) in early 2011. An RCE is a request by an applicant to continue prosecution after the USPTO has issued a final rejection or closed prosecution “on the merits.”

Subsequently, Supernus received patent number 8,747,897 after successfully concluding prosecution. Soon after, Supernus filed an international application, know as a PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty), and elected to prosecute the international PCT in the European Patent Office. After prosecution commenced in the European Office, an opposition was filed exactly 546 days after Supernus had filed the RCE in the USPTO. After receiving the opposition filing, Supernus notified the USPTO. The USPTO subsequently reasoned that the delay between Supernus filing the RCE and notifying the USPTO about the opposition proceeding in the European Office, counted towards an applicant delay in regards to PTA. The USPTO then reduced Supernus’s patent term on the ‘987 patent by the term of the delay, which they calculated to be 546 days.

Supernus then appealed the USPTO’s decision to the District Court. The District Court granted summary judgment to the USPTO, holding that the USPTO did not err in adjusting the length of Supernus’s patent by 546 days citing Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Lee. In Gilead, the USPTO determined that submission of an information disclosure statement (IDS) after the filing of a response to an election or restriction requirement is subject to PTA ultimately leading to a reduction in patent term. The USPTO reasoned that submitting an IDS after the filing of an RCE by an applicant interferes with the USPTO’s ability to examine an application in an efficient manner. In Gilead, the USPTO ruled that a reduction in patent term by 646 days due to applicant delay was proper. The District Court applied similar reasoning from Gilead to find Supernus’s patent term adjustment appropriate.

On a subsequent appeal to the Federal Circuit, the Federal Circuit reversed, citing that Gilead was not the controlling case. The Federal Circuit reasoned that unlike Gilead, which could have notified the USPTO of co-pending applications at the time it responded to a restriction requirement, here Supernus could not have notified the USPTO about the opposition proceeding in the European Office, because the European PCT was filed on the same day as the RCE, so that the opposition had not yet been filed. Gilead involved a period of time during which the applicant “could have taken identifiable efforts to conclude prosecution but did not.” Here, Supernus could not have undertaken any efforts to conclude prosecution during the 546 day time period between filing the RCE and receiving notice of the European opposition.

The Federal Circuit further concluded that Supernus could not have taken any action to further prosecute the patent during that time period. This case is critical, in that the period of time during which an applicant is incapable of taking any action to continue prosecution may not be counted against patent term. This case also highlights that when delays do occur, prompt notification to the USPTO and other offices where patents have been filed such as a PCT is critical. While Gilead is still good law, it was not the controlling law in this case.

Ask a Question


  1. Hey! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog
    platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had
    problems with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform.

    I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a
    good platform.

  2. Usually I do not read article on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to take
    a look at and do it! Your writing taste has been surprised me.
    Thanks, quite great post.

  3. Howdy! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to
    give it a look. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking
    and will be tweeting this to my followers! Exceptional blog and superb design.

  4. Paragraph writing is also a excitement, if you be familiar with afterward you can write otherwise it
    is complex to write.

  5. Good day I am so delighted I found your site, I really found you by
    accident, while I was browsing on Yahoo for something else, Regardless I am here now and would
    just like to say thank you for a tremendous post and a all round entertaining blog (I
    also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse it
    all at the minute but I have saved it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time
    I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the awesome job.

  6. Have you ever considered creating an ebook or guest authoring
    on other blogs? I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you
    share some stories/information. I know my visitors would appreciate your work.
    If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

  7. Hi there colleagues, how is everything, and what you
    would like to say concerning this piece of writing, in my view its actually remarkable designed for me.

  8. Thanks for finally writing about >CAFC Rules
    USPTO Exceeded Its Authority Adjusting Patent Term
    | Caldwell Intellectual Property Law <Loved it!

  9. Hello! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone!
    Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look
    forward to all your posts! Keep up the excellent work!

  10. Hi there to all, how is everything, I think every one is
    getting more from this website, and your views are pleasant in support of
    new viewers.

  11. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with?

    I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time making
    a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and
    Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for
    something unique. P.S My apologies for being
    off-topic but I had to ask!

  12. I’m extremely inspired together with your writing talents and also with the structure in your weblog.
    Is that this a paid subject matter or did you modify it yourself?
    Anyway stay up the excellent high quality writing,
    it’s rare to look a nice blog like this one nowadays..

  13. What’s up colleagues, its impressive paragraph concerning cultureand fully explained, keep it up all the

  14. First off I would like to say wonderful blog! I had
    a quick question that I’d like to ask if you don’t mind.
    I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your mind before writing.
    I’ve had a difficult time clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out there.
    I truly do take pleasure in writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15
    minutes are generally wasted just trying to figure
    out how to begin. Any recommendations or tips?
    Thank you!

  15. quest bars says:

    May I just say what a relief to uncover someone that truly understands what
    they’re talking about on the net. You certainly realize how to
    bring an issue to light and make it important.
    More people need to read this and understand this side of the story.

    I was surprised that you are not more popular since you most certainly have
    the gift.

  16. quest bars says:

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article.
    I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information.
    Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.

  17. I seriously love your website.. Very nice colors & theme.
    Did you create this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m
    planning to create my own site and want to know where
    you got this from or what the theme is called. Kudos!

  18. It’s not my first time to pay a visit this website, i am browsing this web site dailly and take nice information from here everyday.

  19. tinyurl.com says:

    This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.

    I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking
    more of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social

  20. Hello, Neat post. There is an issue along with your website in internet explorer, might test this… IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a good portion of people will pass over your magnificent writing because of this problem.

  21. I all the time emailed this website post page to all my contacts, as if like to
    read it next my friends will too.

  22. Thank you, I’ve just been searching for info approximately this subject for a long time and yours is the
    greatest I have discovered so far. However, what in regards to the conclusion? Are
    you sure about the supply?

  23. tinyurl.com says:

    When someone writes an post he/she maintains the thought of a user in his/her brain that
    how a user can know it. Thus that’s why this paragraph is amazing.

  24. tinyurl.com says:

    What’s up, everything is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing data, that’s actually excellent,
    keep up writing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *